To illustrate how savings change throughout the accumulation phase, Table 1 below shows, for a person age 60, an accumulation period of personal savings over 30 years, based on 3 different investment strategies, that is, secure, balanced and growth, and periods of different returns, that is, low, average and high. In the example, the annual savings deposit is $5000.
It is important to remember that the annual deposit can vary based on your income and the income replacement goal you have set for yourself for your retirement, including income from your pension under the Québec Pension Plan, income from the Old Age security pension and income under a supplemental pension plan, for which you do not have to assume the rate of return risk. You must also remember that the sooner you start saving, the higher your savings will be.
Table 1: Accrued amounts, based on different investment strategies and rates of return, for a person age 60, over an accumulation period of 30 years
Secure strategy | = | 75 % of fixed income, 25 % of variable income, annual deposit of $5000. |
Balanced strategy | = | 50 % of fixed income, 50 % of variable income, annual deposit of $5000. |
Growth strategy | = | 25 % of fixed income, 75 % of variable income, annual deposit of $5000. |
Note: | the invested capital is of $150 000 (30 x $5000) |
i | = | represents the expected return according to the chosen strategy. |
Over an accumulation period of 30 years, with average returns and a secure investment strategy, you could accumulate $276 000 (that is, $150 000 in capital and $126 000 in returns). With a balanced or growth strategy, it is respectively $332 000 and $395 000 that you could accumulate with the same invested capital. In the case of a growth strategy, it is nearly twofold.
Therefore, the strategies with more variable-income securities provide a higher return (5.7 % vs. 3.7%), but with increased risks. In a period of average or high return, those strategies provide higher accrued amounts, whereas taking additional risks can result in almost identical returns (3.0 % vs. 2.6 %) in periods of low returns.